Is this considered perjury?

Facepalm:Large language models have a long, steep hill to climb before they prove trustworthy and reliable.

A professor specializing in the subject should know better.

Expert defends anti-AI misinformation law using chatbot-written misinformation

Minnesota State Representative Mary Franson and YouTuber Christopher Kohls havechallengedthe law, claiming it violates the First Amendment.

The Minnesota Reformer notes that Hancock drew up a well-wordedargumentfor why the legislation is essential.

The problem is that neither of these studies exist in the journal mentioned or any other academic resource.

The plaintiffs filed a memorandumsuggestingthat the citations could be AI-generated.

Ellison and Hancock have not commented on the situation and likely want the embarrassing faux pas to disappear.

If people are not held accountable for misusing AI, how can it ever get better?