Fordesktop applications, the resolution and sharpness of a 4K display are hard to beat.
In today’s buying guide, we will focus solely on 4K gaming monitors.
This means we won’t be discussing 60Hz displays 120Hz is the baseline.
Some people may want to opt for affordable 4K 60Hz displays, but we advise against this for gaming.
The M27U delivers exceptional value and is well-rounded across numerous critical aspects.
The M27U exhibits superb balance in performance, ranging from response time speed to color quality.
No single performance aspect particularly shines, but there are no significant flaws either.
For under $500, it’s rare to find such value from other products we’ve evaluated.
Typically, comparable experiences start in the $550 to $600 bracket, sometimes even higher.
Both monitors present excellent value.
TheLG 32GR93Uis the current 32-inch 4K front-runner.
The 32GR93U excels in various domains.
It boasts respectable response times, and LG has adeptly adjusted it to provide a consistent overdrive mode experience.
While it may not be the quickest monitor at 144Hz, it’s engineered to minimize inverse ghosting artifacts.
The main drawback is that you aren’t getting any HDR hardware capabilities at this price point.
Another option to keep on the radar is theLenovo Legion Y32p-30, often priced around $700.
The Lenovo bears similarities to the LG version but falls slightly short in tuning and optimization.
It demonstrates a tad slower response time, a narrower color spectrum, and is not as finely calibrated.
But these discrepancies are minor.
Also worthy of mention in this category, theGigabyte M32Uremains a good choice.
Once this panel becomes available, we expect other brands to release their own 4K OLED gaming monitors.
So, it’s worth keeping this on your radar for next year.
In the meantime, our top 4K HDR pick remains the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7.
Being a more “traditional” gaming display, the Neo G7 presents several other benefits.
Moreover, its 32-inch size paired with such a resolution is fantastic for desktop use.
However, there are some drawbacks.
The 1000R curvature is pronounced and doesn’t necessarily enhance the viewing experience.
Additionally, the subpar viewing angles require a head-on perspective to maximize the HDR quality.
We’d advise seeking out such deals rather than paying the full price.
We wouldn’t recommend its pricier counterpart though, theNeo G8.
We’d recommend opting for the Neo G7, which delivers consistent and reliable performance.
This assessment will hold true at least until the anticipated 32-inch OLED models are released next year.
OLED panels offer several advantages over LCDs like theOdyssey Neo G7.
These include per-pixel local dimming, swifter response times, and improved viewing angles.
It also has a glossy screen with great reflection handling which makes colors pop and HDR shine.
It has a flat panel with excellent viewing angles.
Of course, as any OLED there are some downsides to consider.
Our friends at TFT Central have evaluated the C3 and determined its performance mirrors that of the C2.
Consequently, there’s no distinct preference between the two models.
Given this, we’d advise opting for whichever model is more affordable.
The 42-inch LG C3 is currently priced at$1,100, a very reasonable price point.
